Properties (104)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
misapplication of self-defense law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2016AP001234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2018 WI 20
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
media coverage
high-profile case self-defense rights community response |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Wisconsin_Supreme_Court
gptkb:Supreme_Court conviction for battery |
| gptkbp:date |
March 2020
March 27, 2018 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Huber
|
| gptkbp:impact |
clarification of self-defense standards
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:State_of_Wisconsin
gptkb:Michael_Huber |
| gptkbp:judges |
appeal process
Justice_Rebecca_Bradley Justice_Ziegler |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Wisconsin
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
self-defense
imminent threat reasonable belief proportionality of response reasonable belief of threat |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
defense attorney
public defender burden of proof prosecutor private attorney self-defense justification application of self-defense |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
case law criminal defense self-defense statutes Wisconsin_Statutes |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
community impact
influence on public policy judicial review legal reforms fair trial rights legal standards defense strategies judicial interpretation legal precedent defendant's rights constitutional rights public safety concerns legal ethics judicial accountability burden of proof legal doctrine self-defense ruling justifiable use of force case law development court's reasoning reassessment of evidence impact on law enforcement training victim's rights changes in jury instructions due process concerns 2020 WI 12 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction overturned
exoneration reversal of conviction new trial ordered retrial ordered not guilty verdict appeal granted legal victory for defendant legal precedent established judgment affirmed legal principles reiterated charges dropped plea deal offered court's reasoning explained defendant's rights protected judicial authority confirmed judicial interpretation provided judicial process scrutinized legal arguments analyzed legal clarification achieved legal framework upheld legal rights affirmed legal standards refined legal system evaluated reexamination of evidence self-defense criteria defined self-defense justification validated |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ann_Walsh_Bradley
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
self-defense laws
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:State_v._Smith
gptkb:State_v._Johnson State v. Self |
| gptkbp:research |
witness testimonies
video footage testimony of witnesses forensic_analysis |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on self-defense cases
|
| gptkbp:year |
2018
2020 |