State v. Houghton

GPTKB entity

Properties (49)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:applicationNumber No. 96462-1
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal appeal
No. 96462-1
gptkbp:citedBy 194 Wash. 2d 1
2019 WL 2341234
gptkbp:community_engagement civil liberties
gptkbp:controversy March 5, 2019
gptkbp:court gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Washington
Houghton
majority_opinion_by_Justice_Yu
gptkbp:decidedBy June 6, 2019
gptkbp:discusses analyzed in legal forums
gptkbp:doctrine exclusionary rule
gptkbp:historicalEvent appealed_from_Court_of_Appeals
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. Houghton
gptkbp:impact shaped public policy
influenced state laws
law_enforcement_practices
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Mary_Yu
Supreme_Court_review
Justice_Johnson
gptkbp:legal_principle search and seizure
reasonable expectation of privacy
gptkbp:legal_representation impact on future cases
Public_Defender's_Office
gptkbp:legalStatus Fourth Amendment
related to privacy rights
gptkbp:notableFeature reviewed by legal scholars
available in legal databases
important for civil rights
discussed in law reviews
upheld constitutional rights
affects law enforcement training
affects police conduct
critical for legal education
important for understanding search laws
involved unlawful search
gptkbp:outcome significant for constitutional law
reaffirmed individual rights
overturned lower court decision
court_ruled_in_favor_of_Houghton
gptkbp:precedent guidance for future cases
limitations on police searches
Fourth_Amendment_rights
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:State_v._Gant
gptkbp:significance clarified search warrant requirements
gptkbp:year 2019