Properties (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
A19-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2021 WL 1234567
Minn. Stat. § 609.06 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2021
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Henneman
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of Minnesota
Defendant_Henneman |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
self-defense
reasonable belief |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Public Defender
reasonable person standard proportionality of response immediacy of threat self-defense criteria perception of danger Prosecutor's_Office |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
burden of proof
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
media coverage
legal reforms law enforcement training community response public perception of justice debate on gun laws discussion on civil liberties impact on public policy advocacy for victims' rights guidance for juries discussion of legal ethics impact on future rulings clarification of self-defense laws influence on legal precedents examination of legal frameworks analysis of legal defenses discussion on violence prevention evaluation of judicial decisions study of criminal justice system |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversal of conviction
future self-defense cases |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:State_v._Smith
gptkb:State_v._Johnson self-defense laws |
| gptkbp:research |
witness testimonies
video footage |
| gptkbp:significance |
self-defense justification
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Minnesota
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
imminent threat
unlawful use of force |
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|