|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:applies_to
|
gptkb:government_agency
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
active
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:community_engagement
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:community_impact
|
high
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
gptkb:significant
substantial
far-reaching
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Facebook,_Inc.
gptkb:legal_case
State Attorney General
example
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
high
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:exhibited_at
|
internal documents
|
|
gptkbp:future_plans
|
broad
|
|
gptkbp:has_impact_on
|
future regulations
|
|
gptkbp:has_member
|
conducted
scheduled
|
|
gptkbp:historical_debate
|
privacy violations
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
State v. Facebook, Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
data protection laws
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:Facebook,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
consumer protection laws
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
data privacy experts
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
tech industry
evolving
anticipated
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
ongoing
private law firms
|
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
data privacy bills
|
|
gptkbp:major_city
|
ongoing
|
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
other tech companies
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
national
varied
frequent
pending
analyzed
expected in 2023
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Ability
influential
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
mixed
divided
|
|
gptkbp:published_year
|
2020-12-01
|
|
gptkbp:regulatory_compliance
|
increased
|
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
social media regulations
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
consumer rights.
|
|
gptkbp:sponsor
|
consumer advocacy groups
|
|
gptkbp:tactics
|
dismissal motion
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2020
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Minnesota_State_Attorney_General
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|