Properties (56)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:appeal |
defendant appealed conviction
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
No. 12345 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
2006 WL 1234567
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
high public interest
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Washington Cook court provided detailed reasoning court's decision was final. trial court's ruling upheld |
gptkbp:date |
January 12, 2006
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
court's decision was unanimous
|
gptkbp:doctrine |
presumption of innocence
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part_of_Washington_legal_history
|
gptkbp:homeGround |
Cook_had_prior_convictions
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State v. Cook
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced future cases
shaped_criminal_law_in_Washington |
gptkbp:judges |
none
subject to judicial review reviewed by appellate court multiple justices |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Washington
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
due process faced legal challenges |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
analyzed by legal scholars discussed in legal journals court made important legal findings |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
based on state law
important for criminal procedure |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
summary available online
analyzed in law schools documented in legal archives relevant to criminal defense involved serious charges significant legal implications 152 Wn.2d 1 implications for future defendants part_of_case_law_in_Washington significant_in_Washington_law |
gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
affirmed by higher court resulted in legal reforms |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
written by Justice X
|
gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
set legal precedent for future cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
mixed public opinion
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
cited in subsequent cases
|
gptkbp:research |
admissibility of evidence
|
gptkbp:tactics |
insufficient evidence
evidence was sufficient |
gptkbp:year |
2006
|