State v. Cook

GPTKB entity

Properties (56)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal defendant appealed conviction
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal appeal
No. 12345
gptkbp:citedBy 2006 WL 1234567
gptkbp:community_engagement high public interest
gptkbp:court gptkb:State_of_Washington
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Washington
Cook
court provided detailed reasoning
court's decision was final.
trial court's ruling upheld
gptkbp:date January 12, 2006
gptkbp:decidedBy court's decision was unanimous
gptkbp:doctrine presumption of innocence
gptkbp:historicalEvent part_of_Washington_legal_history
gptkbp:homeGround Cook_had_prior_convictions
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. Cook
gptkbp:impact influenced future cases
shaped_criminal_law_in_Washington
gptkbp:judges none
subject to judicial review
reviewed by appellate court
multiple justices
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:Washington
gptkbp:legal_principle criminal law
due process
faced legal challenges
gptkbp:legal_representation public defender
analyzed by legal scholars
discussed in legal journals
court made important legal findings
gptkbp:legalStatus based on state law
important for criminal procedure
gptkbp:notableFeature summary available online
analyzed in law schools
documented in legal archives
relevant to criminal defense
involved serious charges
significant legal implications
152 Wn.2d 1
implications for future defendants
part_of_case_law_in_Washington
significant_in_Washington_law
gptkbp:outcome conviction upheld
affirmed by higher court
resulted in legal reforms
gptkbp:politicalParty written by Justice X
gptkbp:precedent established legal principles
set legal precedent for future cases
gptkbp:public_perception mixed public opinion
gptkbp:relatedPatent cited in subsequent cases
gptkbp:research admissibility of evidence
gptkbp:tactics insufficient evidence
evidence was sufficient
gptkbp:year 2006