State v. Connecticut Light and Power Company

GPTKB entity

Statements (53)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:applicationNumber Docket No. 10807
gptkbp:caseTypes civil case
No. 10807
gptkbp:citedBy State_v._Connecticut_Light_&_Power_Co.,_162_Conn._1
gptkbp:court gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Connecticut
majority opinion
affirmed lower court's decision
majority opinion favored state
public necessity
upheld public use standard.
gptkbp:date June 1972
gptkbp:decidedBy 1972
gptkbp:doctrine takings clause
gptkbp:historicalEvent appealed from lower court
gptkbp:homeGround dispute over land acquisition
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. Connecticut Light and Power Company
gptkbp:impact utility regulation
influenced state eminent domain laws
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:State_of_Connecticut
gptkb:Connecticut_Light_and_Power_Company
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_A._Shea
gptkb:Justice_C._Wilcox
gptkbp:jurisdiction gptkb:Connecticut
gptkbp:legal_principle eminent domain
public use requirement
just compensation
fair market value compensation
gptkbp:legal_representation gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Connecticut
interpretation of state constitution
gptkbp:legalStatus context of public utility regulation
set standards for compensation in eminent domain cases
state versus private interests
gptkbp:legislation gptkb:Connecticut_General_Statutes_§_8-130
gptkbp:notableFeature land use planning
impact on future cases
affects property rights
162 Conn. 1, 291 A.2d 240
affects future eminent domain cases
eminent domain and public utility
important in property law
land acquisition for public projects
review of eminent domain practices
gptkbp:outcome affirmed
compensation awarded to property owners
land taken for public use
land use for public benefit
upheld state’s authority
upheld state’s right to take property
gptkbp:precedent influenced future eminent domain cases
established criteria for public use
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Kelo_v._City_of_New_London
gptkbp:soundtrack April 1972