State v. American Electric Power

GPTKB entity

Statements (52)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal appealed_to_the_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:applicationNumber 10-4080
gptkbp:community_engagement mixed reactions
gptkbp:court gptkb:Sixth_Circuit
court favored federal oversight
federal government regulates emissions
federal law preempts state law
majority_opinion_written_by_Judge_Daughtrey
gptkbp:date 2011
September 2011
April 2011
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
gptkbp:environmental_impact gptkb:Natural_Resources_Defense_Council
gptkb:Sierra_Club
EPA_regulations_on_emissions
gptkbp:homeGround originated_from_Ohio's_lawsuit
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label State v. American Electric Power
gptkbp:impact utilities reassess emissions strategies
gptkbp:involves environmental law
gptkbp:is_involved_in gptkb:American_Electric_Power_Company
gptkb:State_of_Ohio
gptkbp:judges reviewed by appellate courts
dissent_by_Judge_Clay
gptkbp:jurisdiction federal jurisdiction
gptkbp:legal_principle carbon dioxide emissions
public nuisance
gptkbp:legal_representation law firms involved
gptkbp:legalStatus Clean Air Act
state vs. federal authority
debated among legal scholars
based on tort law principles
involves terms like 'nuisance' and 'emissions'
part of broader climate litigation efforts
gptkbp:legislation Cap-and-trade legislation
gptkbp:media_coverage extensive media coverage
gptkbp:notableFeature summary available in legal databases
analyzed in law reviews
used in law school curricula
landmark case in environmental law
influences state-federal relations
564 F.3d 496
affects future lawsuits
affects state regulatory powers
remains relevant in ongoing debates
gptkbp:outcome upheld lower court's ruling
dismissed state claims
court_ruled_in_favor_of_AEP
gptkbp:precedent set precedent for future cases
influenced future environmental cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Connecticut_v._American_Electric_Power
gptkbp:significance impact on climate change litigation