Statements (70)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Apple
|
| gptkbp:applies_to |
gptkb:Attorney_General_of_Texas
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
anti-competitive behavior
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State of Texas v. Apple
|
| gptkbp:impact |
consumers
app developers technology industry |
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:government_agency
gptkb:legislation gptkb:legal_frameworks gptkb:Apple_Inc. gptkb:software gptkb:State_of_Texas gptkb:technique gptkb:legal_case gptkb:mobile_application public policy consumer protection digital economy legal compliance public interest regulatory frameworks user experience consumer rights economic justice market access regulatory scrutiny court decisions judicial review legal challenges app distribution federal laws legal disputes expert witnesses government oversight legal precedents economic impact legal standards testimonies market share business models market regulations court hearings legal interpretations evidence legal arguments court rulings digital rights corporate responsibility legal implications antitrust regulations litigation process legal settlements judicial outcomes platform fees application stores |
| gptkbp:issues |
consumer choice
market competition |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
antitrust laws
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
law firms
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
pending
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
monopolistic practices
App Store policies digital marketplaces market dominance |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2020
|