State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
GPTKB entity
Properties (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
Criminal Appeal No. 100 of 1994 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
1994 SCC (3) 299
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
1994
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh
|
| gptkbp:impact |
legal standards for evidence
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Balbir_Singh
State of Punjab |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_S.C._Agarwal
gptkb:Justice_J.S._Verma March 15, 1994 |
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
admissibility of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
burden of proof
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Public Prosecutor
defense counsel |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
interpretation_of_Section_27_of_the_Evidence_Act
|
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
legal education
scholarly articles judicial review legal reforms rights of the accused legal interpretations impact on future cases legal ethics judicial precedents legal commentary witness credibility case analysis law textbooks importance of legal representation impact on law enforcement practices role of the judiciary case law development confession admissibility evidence collection procedures evidence evaluation standards interpretation of confessions police investigation standards public interest in legal cases role of circumstantial evidence |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
affirmed lower court's decision |
| gptkbp:precedent |
evidence law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
State_of_Punjab_v._Kewal_Singh
|