|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:Company
|
|
gptkbp:acquisition
|
by private equity firms
|
|
gptkbp:bankruptcy_consequences
|
loss of taxpayer money
|
|
gptkbp:bankruptcy_effects
|
investor trust
|
|
gptkbp:business_model
|
unsustainable
|
|
gptkbp:ceo
|
gptkb:Brian_Harrison
|
|
gptkbp:closure_type
|
gptkb:2011
|
|
gptkbp:competitors
|
gptkb:First_Solar
|
|
gptkbp:conflict
|
Republican criticism
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
long-lasting
|
|
gptkbp:controversy
|
political implications
government loan guarantees
|
|
gptkbp:criticism
|
failure to meet production targets
|
|
gptkbp:economic_impact
|
job losses
|
|
gptkbp:employees
|
1,100
1,100 (2011)
|
|
gptkbp:environmental_concerns
|
gptkb:Obama_administration
reformed post-bankruptcy
|
|
gptkbp:financial_collapse
|
rapid decline
|
|
gptkbp:financial_troubles
|
overproduction
|
|
gptkbp:financials
|
gptkb:2011
September 2011
renewable energy sector
|
|
gptkbp:founded
|
gptkb:2005
|
|
gptkbp:founder
|
gptkb:Chris_Gronet
|
|
gptkbp:funding
|
debated
$535 million
controversial allocation
|
|
gptkbp:government_loan
|
$535 million
|
|
gptkbp:headquarters
|
gptkb:Fremont,_California
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Solyndra
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
U. S. renewable energy policy
U. S. solar industry
|
|
gptkbp:industry
|
solar energy
|
|
gptkbp:invention
|
solar technology patents
|
|
gptkbp:investigates
|
Congressional hearings
|
|
gptkbp:investment
|
gptkb:Kaiser_Family_Foundation
gptkb:George_Kaiser_Family_Foundation
gptkb:venture_capital
gptkb:Kleiner_Perkins
diminished
failed projects
federal stimulus funds
|
|
gptkbp:investment_focus
|
commercial rooftops
|
|
gptkbp:investor_loss
|
$500 million
|
|
gptkbp:is_debated_in
|
renewable energy funding
|
|
gptkbp:is_monitored_by
|
conducted by the Department of Energy
|
|
gptkbp:legacy
|
government investment failures
impact on clean energy funding
failed green energy investment
|
|
gptkbp:light_requirement
|
CIGS (Copper Indium Gallium Selenide)
CIGS (copper indium gallium selenide)
|
|
gptkbp:market_position
|
gptkb:2011
|
|
gptkbp:market_share
|
declined
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
bankruptcy filing
|
|
gptkbp:partnerships
|
various solar companies
various solar projects
|
|
gptkbp:political_career
|
gptkb:Democratic_Party
|
|
gptkbp:political_scrutiny
|
high-profile case
|
|
gptkbp:power_source
|
sought by U. S.
|
|
gptkbp:products
|
solar panels
|
|
gptkbp:provides_oversight_for
|
criticized
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
controversial
|
|
gptkbp:revenue
|
$100 million (2010)
|
|
gptkbp:solar_energy_innovation
|
stalled
|
|
gptkbp:solar_energy_investments
|
re-evaluated
|
|
gptkbp:solar_energy_market
|
competitive landscape
|
|
gptkbp:solar_industry
|
government support
|
|
gptkbp:solar_market_trends
|
shifted
|
|
gptkbp:solar_panel
|
manufacturing process
|
|
gptkbp:solar_panel_efficiency
|
lower than expected
|
|
gptkbp:solar_panel_production
|
halted
|
|
gptkbp:solar_technology_development
|
halted
|
|
gptkbp:subsidies
|
gptkb:federal_government
|
|
gptkbp:sustainability
|
challenged
|
|
gptkbp:technology
|
thin-film solar cells
|