Statements (18)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
gptkb:Re_Sigsworth
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[1935] Ch 89
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
1935
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Justice_(Chancery_Division)
Justice Farwell |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
England and Wales
|
| gptkbp:legalDoctrine |
Forfeiture rule
|
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
A son who murdered his mother was prevented from inheriting her estate under the Administration of Estates Act 1925.
|
| gptkbp:principle |
A person should not benefit from their own wrongdoing
|
| gptkbp:relatedLegislation |
gptkb:Administration_of_Estates_Act_1925
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Precedent for the principle that no one should profit from their own crime
|
| gptkbp:subject |
statutory interpretation
inheritance law |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Re_Sigsworth
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sigsworth's case
|