Statements (26)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:law
|
| gptkbp:application |
Alison Sharland
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[2015] UKSC 60
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
14 October 2015
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Sharland v Sharland [2015] UKSC 60
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sharland v Sharland
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lord_Neuberger gptkb:Lord_Clarke gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom gptkb:Lord_Sumption gptkb:Lord_Reed gptkb:Lord_Hodge gptkb:Lord_Wilson |
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:family
non-disclosure financial remedy |
| gptkbp:numberOfIssues |
fraudulent non-disclosure in financial proceedings
|
| gptkbp:precedentSet |
effect of non-disclosure on financial settlements
|
| gptkbp:principle |
Non-disclosure undermines the basis of consent orders in financial remedy cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Charles_Sharland
|
| gptkbp:result |
Supreme Court allowed appeal
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Alphonso_Sharland
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|