Statements (15)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:philosophical_essay_section
|
| gptkbp:author |
gptkb:David_Hume
|
| gptkbp:countryOfOrigin |
gptkb:Scotland
|
| gptkbp:influenced |
gptkb:philosophy
skepticism about miracles |
| gptkbp:language |
English
|
| gptkbp:mainArgument |
testimony for miracles is insufficient to establish their occurrence
|
| gptkbp:notableQuote |
A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature.
No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would be more miraculous, than the fact, which it endeavors to establish. |
| gptkbp:partOf |
gptkb:An_Enquiry_concerning_Human_Understanding
|
| gptkbp:publishedIn |
1748
|
| gptkbp:topic |
miracles
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Hume's_Enquiry
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Section X: Of Miracles
|