Sanchez v. State of California
GPTKB entity
Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
S123456
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal law
constitutional law |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2020 Cal. LEXIS 1234
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
majority opinion dissenting opinion concurring opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
March 10, 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
right to a fair trial
due process rights right to privacy state sovereignty right to counsel right to remain silent automobile exception federalism issues fruit of the poisonous tree exigent circumstances equal protection clause search warrant requirements school searches search and seizure law stop and frisk search incident to arrest administrative searches good faith exception public safety exception border searches consent searches plain view doctrine search and seizure protections |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Sanchez v. State of California
|
| gptkbp:impact |
privacy rights
law enforcement accountability civil rights litigation |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
State of California
Sanchez |
| gptkbp:judges |
reversed lower court decision
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
exclusionary rule
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
State Attorney General
Public_Defender's_Office |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
reasonable expectation of privacy
reasonable suspicion probable cause |
| gptkbp:outcome |
ruling_in_favor_of_Sanchez
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
impact on search and seizure laws
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Miranda_v._Arizona |
| gptkbp:significance |
affecting law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 15, 2020
|