gptkbp:instanceOf
|
Supreme Court judgment
|
gptkbp:challengedPractice
|
Religious custom barring women
|
gptkbp:citedArticles
|
gptkb:Article_25
gptkb:Article_14
gptkb:Article_15
Article 17
|
gptkbp:deliveredBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_India
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Indu_Malhotra
|
gptkbp:effect
|
Allowed entry of women of all ages into Sabarimala Temple
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Sabarimala verdict
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Debate on gender and religious rights in India
|
gptkbp:judgesOnBench
|
gptkb:Dipak_Misra
gptkb:A._M._Khanwilkar
gptkb:Indu_Malhotra
gptkb:R._F._Nariman
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
|
gptkbp:judgmentDate
|
2018-09-28
|
gptkbp:leader
|
gptkb:Dipak_Misra
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Dipak_Misra
gptkb:A._M._Khanwilkar
gptkb:R._F._Nariman
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
|
gptkbp:powers
|
5-judge Constitution Bench
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Freedom of religion
Right to equality
Non-discrimination
|
gptkbp:publicReaction
|
Widespread protests in Kerala
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Travancore_Devaswom_Board
gptkb:Sabarimala_Temple
|
gptkbp:reviewPetitionFiled
|
2018-11-13
|
gptkbp:reviewPetitionStatus
|
Pending as of 2024
|
gptkbp:ruledOn
|
Ban on entry of women
|
gptkbp:subjectOfJudgment
|
Entry of women of menstruating age (10-50 years) into Sabarimala Temple
|
gptkbp:verdict
|
Ban unconstitutional
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:D._Y._Chandrachud
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|