S v. Makwanyane

GPTKB entity

Properties (47)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:caseOutcome death penalty declared unconstitutional
affirmed right to life
reaffirmed constitutional values
reformed criminal justice system
shifted public opinion on capital punishment
gptkbp:caseTypes constitutional law case
gptkbp:commander gptkb:Arthur_Chaskalson
gptkbp:court 11 judges
death penalty unconstitutional
Johannesburg,_South_Africa
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Constitutional_Court_of_South_Africa
gptkbp:gameFeatures Makwanyane
gptkbp:historicalContext gptkb:post-apartheid_South_Africa
gptkbp:historicalEvent appealed from lower court
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label S v. Makwanyane
gptkbp:impact human_rights_law_in_South_Africa
gptkbp:judges none
unanimous decision
6 June 1995
constitutionality of the death penalty
proportionality and human rights
reviewed by international courts
strengthened constitutional rights
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:South_African_Constitution
right to life
set a precedent for future cases
extensively analyzed in legal literature
advocates for both parties
cruel and inhuman punishment
influenced abolition of death penalty globally
morality of state-sanctioned death
overturned previous death sentences
abolished_the_death_penalty_in_South_Africa
gptkbp:notableEvent gptkb:Criminal_Law_Amendment_Act
gptkbp:notableFeature available in legal databases
used in law schools
remains relevant in legal discussions
1995 (3) SA 391 (CC)
examined morality of capital punishment
inspired similar rulings in other countries
landmark_ruling_in_South_African_law
gptkbp:politicalParty protection of human dignity
gptkbp:precedent influenced future cases on capital punishment
gptkbp:publicAccess widely supported by human rights activists
gptkbp:respondsTo State
gptkbp:year 1995