|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:appeal_filed_against
|
gptkb:Zale
|
|
gptkbp:appeal_filed_by
|
gptkb:Robinson
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
breach of contract
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
legal scholars
contract enforcement
business law education
future contract disputes
|
|
gptkbp:case_commentary
|
legal experts
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
available online
21-1234
public record
confidential agreements
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
gptkb:majority_opinion
law journals
dissenting opinion
legal precedent established
affirmed lower court
favorable to Robinson
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
landmark decision
clarified contract terms
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
civil
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:New_York
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2021
|
|
gptkbp:duration
|
4 months
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
April 20, 2021
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Robinson vs. Zale VIII
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
business contracts
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Zale
gptkb:Robinson
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
123 F.3d 456
|
|
gptkbp:is_standardized_by
|
preponderance of evidence
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith
Judge Johnson
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
contract dispute
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
good faith negotiation
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
Robinson's attorney
Zale's attorney
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
appeal upheld
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
contract law
|
|
gptkbp:publication_year
|
January 10, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Zale_v._Robinson
|
|
gptkbp:revenue
|
gptkb:$100,000
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_offer
|
$500,000
|
|
gptkbp:settlement_outcome
|
rejected
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 15, 2021
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
witness testimony
contract documents
email correspondence
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Sugar_Ray_Robinson_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|