Statements (51)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:case_number |
21-1234
|
gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
dissenting opinion |
gptkbp:case_significance |
influences future cases
informs public policy sets legal precedent affects business practices advances legal scholarship clarifies contract law shapes legal education affirms lower court ruling addresses ambiguity in contracts affects legal strategy contributes to legal literature emphasizes clarity in contract language encourages compliance with contracts enhances understanding of contract law guides dispute resolution highlights importance of written agreements influences judicial reasoning informs contract negotiations interprets contract terms promotes fair dealings provides case study for law students provides guidance for attorneys reinforces legal standards serves as reference for legal practitioners supports legal accountability |
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_District_Court
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2021
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
April 20, 2021
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Robinson vs. Graziano II
|
gptkbp:impact |
contract enforcement
|
gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Robinson
gptkb:Graziano |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
contract dispute
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
breach of contract
specific performance good faith negotiation damages assessment |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Graziano's attorney
Robinson's attorney |
gptkbp:outcome |
appeal upheld
|
gptkbp:precedent |
contract law
|
gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Graziano_v._Robinson
gptkb:Robinson_v._Graziano_I |
gptkbp:sound |
March 15, 2021
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Sugar_Ray_Robinson_Jr.
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|