Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
English law
|
| gptkbp:area |
Equity
Trusts law |
| gptkbp:citation |
[1952] Ch 499
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
1952
|
| gptkbp:fullTitle |
Re Rose [1952] Ch 499
|
| gptkbp:hasKeyword |
equity, trusts, transfer, shares, gifts, perfection of gifts
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Re Rose
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Court_of_Appeal_of_England_and_Wales
Romer LJ Evershed MR Jenkins LJ |
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
Re Rose established that if a donor has done everything in their power to transfer property, equity will treat the transfer as effective, even if legal title passes later.
|
| gptkbp:principle |
Equity regards as done that which ought to be done
The 'every effort' rule in the transfer of shares |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Mascall v Mascall
Pennington v Waine |
| gptkbp:subject |
Transfer of shares
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Denning_J
gptkb:Denning_LJ |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|