Statements (18)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:English_trust_law_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[1979] 1 WLR 278
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
1979
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:High_Court_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:judge |
Browne-Wilkinson J
|
| gptkbp:key |
A gift subject to a condition precedent is valid if at least one person can be said to qualify.
The test for certainty of objects is less strict for gifts than for discretionary trusts. |
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
certainty of objects
gifts subject to condition precedent |
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
Case concerning the certainty of objects in trusts and gifts.
|
| gptkbp:principle |
'Friends' as a class is sufficiently certain for a gift subject to a condition precedent.
|
| gptkbp:relevantLaw |
law of trusts
|
| gptkbp:testator |
Mrs. Ethel Maud Barlow
|
| gptkbp:willProvision |
Allowed friends and family to purchase paintings at a set price
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Dillon_LJ
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Re Barlow’s Will Trusts
|