R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly
GPTKB entity
Statements (24)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
UK legal case
|
| gptkbp:alsoKnownAs |
ex parte Daly
|
| gptkbp:application |
gptkb:David_Daly
|
| gptkbp:area |
Human rights law
Administrative law |
| gptkbp:citation |
[2001] 2 AC 532
[2001] UKHL 26 |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
23 May 2001
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
gptkb:Lord_Scott_of_Foscote gptkb:Lord_Bingham_of_Cornhill gptkb:Lord_Steyn gptkb:Lord_Hutton Lord Cooke of Thorndon |
| gptkbp:principle |
Proportionality in judicial review
Right to confidential legal correspondence |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Confirmed the importance of the Human Rights Act 1998 in judicial review
Clarified the difference between proportionality and Wednesbury unreasonableness |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Lord_Hoffmann
gptkb:UK_administrative_law |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|