R v Secretary of State for the Home Department

GPTKB entity

Properties (56)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal civil appeal
gptkbp:area administrative law
gptkbp:caseTypes 2001/0010
arose from a challenge to deportation
others praised its fairness
gptkbp:court gptkb:House_of_Lords
government must follow due process
gptkbp:criticism some viewed it as too lenient
gptkbp:decidedBy appeal allowed
gptkbp:discusses debated in legal circles
frequently cited in legal texts
often referenced in court cases.
gptkbp:historicalEvent remains a reference point in law
gptkbp:homeGround involved a foreign national
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label R v Secretary of State for the Home Department
gptkbp:impact strengthened judicial review
influenced subsequent rulings
increased scrutiny of deportation cases
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Lord_Scott
gptkb:Lord_Bingham
gptkb:Lord_Rodger
gptkb:Lord_Steyn
Lord Hope
May 22, 2002
subject to ongoing analysis
gptkbp:legal_principle judicial review
gptkbp:legal_representation respondent represented by the Attorney General
appellant_represented_by_David_Pannick
gptkbp:legislation Human Rights Act 1998
Immigration Act 1971
gptkbp:notableFeature landmark decision
available in legal databases
important for legal precedents
varied among legal scholars
shaped future legal arguments
important for human rights law
examines the balance of power
[2002] UKHL 26
affects future immigration policy
affects legal practitioners
concerns about fairness in deportation
critical for understanding administrative law
essential for understanding deportation law
highly regarded in legal studies
shaped future legal frameworks
varied among practitioners
widely analyzed in law reviews
gptkbp:outcome influenced public policy discussions
led to changes in policy
deportation order quashed
reaffirmed the rule of law
gptkbp:precedent influential case
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:R_v_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department_(No_2)
gptkbp:significance impact on immigration law
gptkbp:year 2002