R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
GPTKB entity
Properties (33)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
allowed
|
| gptkbp:area |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2018/001234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
[2020] UKSC 12
|
| gptkbp:claims |
individuals affected by welfare cuts
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
widespread media coverage
debate on welfare policy |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:date |
February 2020
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:governmentType |
gptkb:Department_for_Work_and_Pensions
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
|
| gptkbp:impact |
welfare reform
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lady_Black
gptkb:Lord_Kitchin gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones gptkb:Lord_Reed Lord_Sales |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
discrimination
proportionality legitimate aim |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public interest lawyers
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Welfare_Reform_Act_2012
Human Rights Act 1998 Equality Act 2010 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
judgment in favor of the claimant
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
welfare benefits
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
R_(on_the_application_of)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions
R_(on_the_application_of)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Work_and_Pensions_(No_2) |
| gptkbp:significance |
landmark case
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 2020
|