R v Secretary of State for Transport

GPTKB entity

Properties (45)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:appeal Appeal_against_a_decision_of_the_High_Court
gptkbp:caseTypes Public law case
gptkbp:court gptkb:House_of_Lords
Judgment delivered on 1 February 2006
gptkbp:decidedBy Judgment_in_favor_of_the_Secretary_of_State
gptkbp:doctrine Doctrine of legitimate expectation
gptkbp:homeGround Originated from a challenge to transport decisions
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label R v Secretary of State for Transport
gptkbp:impact Influenced public transport policy
Influenced transport policy reforms
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Lord_Scott
gptkb:Lord_Bingham
gptkb:Lord_Rodger
Lord Hope
Lord Mance
Reasonableness standard
gptkbp:legal_principle Transport policy
Judicial review
gptkbp:legal_representation Represented by the Attorney General
Represented_by_the_Secretary_of_State's_legal_team
gptkbp:legalStatus Part_of_UK_transport_law
Part_of_the_UK's_legal_framework_on_transport
gptkbp:legislation Transport Act 2000
Transport_and_Works_Act_1992
gptkbp:notableFeature Set precedents for future cases
Analyzed the balance of powers in transport law
Cited in subsequent transport law cases
Clarified judicial review standards
Examined the role of public authorities
Implications for local government decisions
Judicial review of transport decisions
Judicial review of transport policy decisions.
Relevant for transport policy discussions
Significant for understanding administrative law
[2006] UKHL 3
Involved multiple parties including local authorities
gptkbp:outcome Reinforced the need for transparency in decision-making
Impact on transport regulations
Judgment affected transport planning processes
Reaffirmed_the_authority_of_the_Secretary_of_State
gptkbp:precedent Influenced future transport cases
gptkbp:relatedPatent R_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Transport_(No_2)
gptkbp:significance Important for administrative law
gptkbp:year 2006