Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:crime
|
| gptkbp:citation |
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 484
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_L'Heureux-Dubé
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Canada
|
| gptkbp:date |
1997
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Major
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:R_v_S_(R.D.),_[1997]_3_S.C.R._484
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v S (R.D.)
|
| gptkbp:involvedIn |
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
gptkb:R.D.S. |
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
judicial bias
reasonable apprehension of bias |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Justice_Cory
|
| gptkbp:notableFor |
leading case on judicial impartiality in Canada
|
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
The case addressed whether a judge's comments gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
test for reasonable apprehension of bias
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ian_Binnie
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|