Statements (15)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:Canadian_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:application |
gptkb:Khela
|
| gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:[1995]_4_S.C.R._201
|
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Canada
|
| gptkbp:date |
1995
|
| gptkbp:fullTitle |
gptkb:R_v_Khela,_[1995]_4_S.C.R._201
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
Supreme Court held that habeas corpus is available to challenge the legality of detention even when other remedies exist
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:crime
habeas corpus |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:The_Crown_(R)
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified the scope of habeas corpus in Canadian law
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ian_Binnie
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Khela
|