Statements (15)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
Canadian Supreme Court case
|
gptkbp:application |
gptkb:Khela
|
gptkbp:citation |
gptkb:[1995]_4_S.C.R._201
|
gptkbp:country |
gptkb:Canada
|
gptkbp:date |
1995
|
gptkbp:fullTitle |
gptkb:R_v_Khela,_[1995]_4_S.C.R._201
|
gptkbp:heldBy |
Supreme Court held that habeas corpus is available to challenge the legality of detention even when other remedies exist
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v Khela
|
gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:crime
habeas corpus |
gptkbp:response |
gptkb:The_Crown_(R)
|
gptkbp:significance |
clarified the scope of habeas corpus in Canadian law
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ian_Binnie
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|