|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
Criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:charterSection
|
gptkb:Section_2(a)_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[1985] 1 S.C.R. 295
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:Canada
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1985-04-24
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Big_M_Drug_Mart_Ltd.
|
|
gptkbp:effect
|
Expanded interpretation of freedom of religion in Canada
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen_v_Big_M_Drug_Mart_Ltd.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd.
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Dickson_J.
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
Constitutionality of the Lord's Day Act
Freedom of religion under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Alberta,_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Lord's_Day_Act
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Lord's Day Act declared unconstitutional
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Landmark case for religious freedom in Canada
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|