Statements (63)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
retrial ordered
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2017 SCC 41
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
unanimous ruling |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. S. (R.J.)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
evidence law
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Canada
legal reasoning legal frameworks legal proceedings court decisions judicial review legal challenges legal principles case law judicial scrutiny legal precedents legal standards legal review judicial discretion court procedures judicial decisions judicial interpretation court rulings legal scrutiny credibility assessment sexual assault legal analysis evidence evaluation legal implications legal context legal outcomes case analysis court interpretations judicial processes judicial outcomes court practices legal assessments child witness court analysis court evaluations court scrutiny testimony issues legal_arguments R.J. |
| gptkbp:judges |
June 15, 2018
|
| gptkbp:judgingCriteria |
Justice Moldaver
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
defense attorney fair trial rights prosecutor admissibility of evidence |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
clarification of legal standards
[2018] 2 S.C.R. 1 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal allowed
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
family law
child protection laws |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on legal standards for evidence
|
| gptkbp:year |
2018
|