Properties (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
appeal allowed
influenced legal education new trial ordered influences jury instructions influences policy discussions sets precedent for similar cases shapes legal arguments affects defendant rights affects evidence handling affects legal practice standards affects prosecution strategies influences appeal processes raises ethical considerations shapes societal views on justice shapes trial conduct subject to critical analysis |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
25700 debated in legal forums affects human rights considerations guides judicial discretion informs defense strategies |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
analyzed in law reviews |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
cited in numerous cases
|
| gptkbp:hasJurisdictionOver |
gptkb:Canada
|
| gptkbp:hasLegalEvent |
informs legal curriculum
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. S. (Q.)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
evidence admissibility standards
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
Charter of Rights and Freedoms
|
| gptkbp:involved |
R (appellant)
S (respondent) |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Binnie
Justice Iacobucci |
| gptkbp:judgingCriteria |
gptkb:Justice_McLachlin
|
| gptkbp:keyIssues |
admissibility of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
criminal law
fair trial rights impact on trial procedures Canadian_criminal_justice_system |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
reviewed by legal scholars
available in legal databases discussed in legal journals referenced in court decisions [1997] 2 S.C.R. 211 evidence improperly admitted important for defense rights |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_McLachlin
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
evidence law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:R_v._Kapp
gptkb:R_v._Whitfield affects future cases |
| gptkbp:team |
related to evidence law reforms
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
1997
|