|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:application
|
Donald John Marshall, Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
[1999] 3 S.C.R. 456
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Cory
gptkb:Justice_LeBel
gptkb:Justice_Iacobucci
gptkb:Justice_L'Heureux-Dubé
gptkb:Justice_McLachlin
gptkb:Justice_Bastarache
gptkb:Justice_Gonthier
gptkb:Justice_Major
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:Canada
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1999-09-17
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
26014
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Her Majesty The Queen v. Donald John Marshall, Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Mi'kmaq have a treaty right to fish and trade for a moderate livelihood
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v. Marshall (1999)
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
Treaty rights
Aboriginal law
Fishing rights
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Nova_Scotia
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Binnie
|
|
gptkbp:numberOfIssues
|
Interpretation of Mi'kmaq treaty rights
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
R v. Marshall (No. 2) (1999)
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Her_Majesty_The_Queen
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
Landmark case for Indigenous rights in Canada
|
|
gptkbp:subjectOf
|
gptkb:media
legal analysis
academic commentary
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Treaty_of_1760-61
gptkb:Mi'kmaq–British_treaties
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|