Statements (56)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:the_Royal_Courts_of_Justice
|
gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
self-defense laws
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
2020-01-30
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R v. H (2020)
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced future self-defense cases
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:2020_SCC_1
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
R (appellant)
H (respondent) |
gptkbp:judging_criteria |
unanimous decision
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Native_American_tribe
|
gptkbp:key_issues |
self-defense
|
gptkbp:legal_issue |
proportionality in self-defense
Chief Justice and Justices |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
burden of proof
reasonable person standard self-defense criteria counsel for appellant counsel for respondent imminent threat assessment subjective vs objective test |
gptkbp:material |
involved a stabbing incident
|
gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:R_v._Duffy
gptkb:R_v._Lavallee gptkb:R_v._Dorsey gptkb:R_v._Dyer gptkb:R_v._Dineley |
gptkbp:outcome |
appeal allowed
new trial ordered retrial ordered influenced law enforcement training influenced jury instructions shaped legal discourse increased awareness of legal rights reassessment of evidence highlighted need for legal reform shaped future legal strategies affected public perception of self-defense led to legislative discussions inspired advocacy for victims' rights important for legal clarity encouraged community discussions on violence led to academic research on self-defense laws prompted legal education initiatives sparked media coverage on self-defense cases |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:R_v._Mc_Intosh
established self-defense standards |
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:none
|
gptkbp:research |
gptkb:music_video
expert testimony eyewitness testimony |
gptkbp:significance |
clarified reasonable belief in self-defense
|