|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:area
|
criminal law
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:government_officials
gptkb:human_rights_advocates
gptkb:media_outlets
gptkb:public_opinion
gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement
policy makers
academic institutions
law enforcement agencies
law students
legal scholars
judicial bodies
legal practitioners
legal commentators
criminal defense attorneys
|
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
33200
|
|
gptkbp:context
|
search incident to arrest
traffic stop
police discretion
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:2009
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
May 14, 2009
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
R v. Grant
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
Canadian law enforcement practices
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
2009 SCC 32
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
unanimous decision
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Rothstein_J.
gptkb:Deschamps_J.
gptkb:Abella_J.
gptkb:Fish_J.
gptkb:Mc_Lachlin_C._J.
gptkb:Moldaver_J.
Binnie J.
Charron J.
Le Bel J.
|
|
gptkbp:key_issues
|
search and seizure
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
gptkb:Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
exclusionary rule
reasonable expectation of privacy
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
defense counsel
Crown counsel
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
public awareness
judicial oversight
police training
evidence excluded
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
Charter rights
|
|
gptkbp:propulsion
|
gptkb:David_Grant
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:R_v._Whitfield
R v. Mann
R v. Collins
|
|
gptkbp:responds_to
|
gptkb:The_Queen
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
gptkb:cultural_landmark
|
|
gptkbp:sound
|
March 25, 2008
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of
|
physical evidence
testimonial evidence
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Mc_Lachlin,_C._J.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|