R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
GPTKB entity
Properties (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
Supreme_Court_appeal
|
| gptkbp:area |
privacy law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
[2018] UKSC 22
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
national security
government accountability individual rights |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
gptkb:London |
| gptkbp:date |
October 2019
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2019
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
|
| gptkbp:impact |
strengthened privacy rights
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Privacy International
Investigatory Powers Tribunal |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lord_Wilson gptkb:Lord_Kerr gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones gptkb:Lord_Reed unanimous ruling subject of judicial review |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
right to a fair trial
right to privacy transparency in government actions judicial oversight of surveillance proportionality in surveillance |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
human rights lawyers
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
Investigatory Powers Act 2016
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
analyzed by legal scholars
discussed in legal journals used in law school curricula cited in court decisions examined in human rights reports affects government surveillance practices |
| gptkbp:outcome |
shaped future legislation
influenced public debate on privacy raised awareness of surveillance issues decision_in_favor_of_Privacy_International |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Privacy_International_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Foreign_and_Commonwealth_Affairs
Liberty_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Foreign_and_Commonwealth_Affairs B_v_Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department |
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on surveillance laws
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
February 2019
|