R (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister
GPTKB entity
Properties (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:aftermath |
political fallout
calls for reform legal reforms proposed increased scrutiny of executive power constitutional conventions discussed judicial independence emphasized political discourse changed public trust in government questioned impact_on_Brexit_negotiations |
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
protests
rule of law government transparency criticism of government democratic_process support_for_Miller |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
September 24, 2019
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:Gina_Miller
|
| gptkbp:governs |
proroguing_Parliament
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister
|
| gptkbp:impact |
political accountability
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lady_Hale
gptkb:Lady_Black gptkb:Lord_Kitchin gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones gptkb:Lord_Carnwath gptkb:Lord_Hodge gptkb:Lord_Reed unanimous decision Lord_Sales |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
judicial review
separation of powers Parliamentary sovereignty prorogation_of_Parliament |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:David_Pannick_QC
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
lack of justification
political motivation unlawful advice misleading_Parliament |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
editorials
extensive coverage analysis of implications |
| gptkbp:outcome |
prorogation was unlawful
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
impact on future prorogation cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Cherry_v_Advocate_General_for_Scotland
Miller_II |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
Prime_Minister_Boris_Johnson
|
| gptkbp:significance |
constitutional law
|