R (Miller) v Prime Minister
GPTKB entity
Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
constitutional law
judicial review separation of powers rule of law democratic principles political accountability impact on civil rights impact on legal education impact on political activism impact on political discourse impact on public trust in government impact on public policy impact on legal precedents impact on international law impact on government transparency impact on future government actions impact on parliamentary procedures impact on constitutional reforms impact on Brexit process impact on citizen engagement impact on future legal challenges |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:UK_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
September 24, 2019
|
| gptkbp:government_response |
appealed decision
defended prorogation |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (Miller) v Prime Minister
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Brexit negotiations
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
unlawful advice to prorogue Parliament
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Sales
gptkb:Lady_Hale gptkb:Lord_Wilson gptkb:Lady_Black gptkb:Lord_Kitchin gptkb:Lord_Lloyd-Jones gptkb:Lord_Carnwath gptkb:Lord_Reed |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
executive power limitations
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:David_Pannick
gptkb:James_Eadie |
| gptkbp:outcome |
prorogation declared unlawful
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Miller_I_case
|
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:Gina_Miller
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
gptkb:protests
significant media coverage criticism of government support for Gina Miller |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Cherry_v_Advocate_General_for_Scotland
Miller I |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
Prime Minister Boris Johnson
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Parliamentary sovereignty
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|