R (Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
GPTKB entity
Statements (20)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
UK Supreme Court case
|
| gptkbp:category |
LGBT rights case
UK constitutional law case Human rights law case |
| gptkbp:citation |
[2021] UKSC 56
|
| gptkbp:claimedBy |
Christie Elan-Cane
|
| gptkbp:date |
15 December 2021
|
| gptkbp:followedBy |
No further appeal in the UK
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
R (on the application of Christie Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:legalIssue |
interpretation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights
right to a gender-neutral passport |
| gptkbp:plotSummary |
The Supreme Court held that the UK government was not required to provide a gender-neutral passport option.
|
| gptkbp:precededBy |
Court of Appeal decision [2020] EWCA Civ 363
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
|
| gptkbp:result |
appeal dismissed
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Baroness_Hale
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|