R (Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
GPTKB entity
Statements (28)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:UK_legal_case
|
| gptkbp:application |
gptkb:David_Daly
|
| gptkbp:area |
gptkb:constitutional_law
Human rights law |
| gptkbp:citation |
[2001] 2 AC 532
[2001] UKHL 26 [2001] 2 WLR 1622 [2001] 3 All ER 433 |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_Kingdom
|
| gptkbp:date |
23 May 2001
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
Regina (Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
| gptkbp:judge |
gptkb:House_of_Lords
gptkb:Lord_Bingham_of_Cornhill gptkb:Lord_Steyn gptkb:Lord_Hutton Lord Cooke of Thorndon Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough |
| gptkbp:principle |
Judicial review
Proportionality |
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Secretary_of_State_for_the_Home_Department
|
| gptkbp:result |
Appeal allowed
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the test for proportionality in UK law
Distinguished between proportionality and traditional Wednesbury unreasonableness review |
| gptkbp:subject |
Prisoners' rights
Right to confidential correspondence with legal advisers |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Doctrine_of_Proportionality
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
8
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R (Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department
|