Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:area |
Aboriginal law
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Canada
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1990-04-18
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
R. v. Sparrow
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced Canadian policy on Indigenous rights
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
[1990] 1 S. C. R. 1075
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_John_Major
gptkb:Justice_Bertha_Wilson gptkb:Justice_Rosalie_Abella Chief Justice Brian Dickson Justice Antonio Lamer Justice Gerald Le Dain Justice John Sopinka Justice Peter Cory Justice Claire L' Heureux-Dubé Justice William Mc Intyre |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
fishing rights of Indigenous peoples
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Section_35_of_the_Constitution_Act,_1982
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
the court ruled in favor of Sparrow
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
subsequent Aboriginal rights cases
|
| gptkbp:propulsion |
gptkb:Ronald_Sparrow
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
R. v. Adams
R. v. Blais R. v. Bouchard R. v. Boucher R. v. Boulanger R. v. Côté R. v. Gladstone R. v. Kapp R. v. Kelsey R. v. Kinew R. v. Marshall R. v. Mc Ivor R. v. Nikal R. v. Sappier R. v. Van der Peet |
| gptkbp:responds_to |
gptkb:Her_Majesty_the_Queen
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established the test for determining the validity of government actions that infringe on Aboriginal rights
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Royal_Commission_on_Aboriginal_Peoples
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|