Statements (71)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
state responsibility
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Uruguay
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:International_Court_of_Justice
|
| gptkbp:established |
gptkb:Argentina
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pulp Mills case
|
| gptkbp:impact |
bilateral relations
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Argentina
gptkb:Uruguay environmental law international relations NGOs environmental impact assessments government policies media coverage public opinion public policy environmental assessments international law international standards international treaties legal compliance legal education local communities stakeholder engagement economic impact assessments environmental regulations evidence presentation government accountability human rights issues legal frameworks sustainability practices diplomatic negotiations international cooperation judicial review legal reforms socioeconomic factors environmental advocacy political implications public health concerns social movements community activism legal precedents environmental justice legal advocacy scientific studies water rights court procedures land use issues transparency issues conflict resolution mechanisms environmental policy making economic interests community rights corporate responsibility court jurisdiction expert testimonies climate change implications international law principles biodiversity concerns legal_arguments |
| gptkbp:is_a_platform_for |
Treaty on the River Uruguay
|
| gptkbp:issues |
environmental impact
cross-border pollution |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
transboundary harm
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
ICJ_ruling_in_favor_of_Uruguay
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
future environmental disputes
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:River_Uruguay
sustainable development Fray_Bentos_pulp_mill |
| gptkbp:year |
2010
|