Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Aaron_Pryor
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
gptkb:Board_of_Immigration_Appeals
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
civil
available in legal databases A206-123-456 asylum claim denial important for immigration law precedents |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Atlanta,_Georgia
gptkb:legal_case |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2018
published opinion |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
16-15253
|
| gptkbp:duration |
approximately 1 year
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
February 15, 2018
|
| gptkbp:eye_color |
oral argument
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
gptkb:2017
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pryor vs. Whitaker
|
| gptkbp:impact |
asylum seekers' rights
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:911_F.3d_1002
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Beverly_B._Martin
gptkb:William_H._Pryor_Jr. gptkb:Robert_L._Wilkins |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:government_agency
nexus requirement |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
pro bono
review of asylum eligibility |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Immigration_and_Nationality_Act
|
| gptkbp:material |
applicant from El Salvador
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Matter_of_A-B-
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:2016
gptkb:A._L._H._Pryor gptkb:J._Whitaker analyzed by legal scholars frequently cited in legal arguments discussed in law reviews remanded for further proceedings clarified legal standards current immigration debates reversed decision shapes future legal interpretations impact on future asylum claims affects immigration judges' decisions details of the ruling discussed in courts. influential in immigration law |
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:INS_v._Cardoza-Fonseca
established standards for asylum claims |
| gptkbp:return_policy |
affects U. S. asylum policy
|
| gptkbp:significance |
influenced future immigration cases
interpretation of statutory language |
| gptkbp:use_case |
gptkb:2018
|