Statements (65)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Aaron_Pryor
|
gptkbp:case_types |
99-1234
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2000
|
gptkbp:effective_date |
April 20, 2000
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Pryor vs. Buchanan
|
gptkbp:impact |
civil rights
constitutional law media law |
gptkbp:is_cited_in |
No. 99-1234
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Pryor
Buchanan |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith Judge Johnson |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:freedom_of_expression
gptkb:First_Amendment First Amendment rights free speech civil liberties prior restraint |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
Buchanan's attorney
Pryor's attorney |
gptkbp:notable_event |
Buchanan v. State
Pryor v. State |
gptkbp:outcome |
reflected societal norms
influenced future rulings set a precedent examined legal standards reflected on historical context scrutinized evidentiary standards debated moral implications assessed judicial discretion considered public policy addressed public interest analyzed government regulation examined legislative intent debated legal ethics reviewed appellate procedures considered international law Pryor won the case analyzed constitutional interpretation analyzed judicial activism assessed social justice considered future implications considered social values debated community standards discussed artistic expression discussed comparative law discussed constitutional safeguards discussed judicial review evaluated harm principle examined legal philosophy examined state censorship explored legal remedies favor of Pryor highlighted First Amendment issues reflected on legal history |
gptkbp:precedent |
First Amendment jurisprudence
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
Judge Doe |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on free speech cases
|
gptkbp:sound |
March 15, 2000
|