Statements (53)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:concept
|
| gptkbp:associated_with |
Suburban development.
Consumerism. Real estate trends. |
| gptkbp:benefits |
Increased security.
Limited public access. Control over community standards. Higher costs of living. Potential for exclusion. |
| gptkbp:characteristics |
May have homeowners' associations.
Often features gated access. Typically has private amenities. |
| gptkbp:community_impact |
Affects social interactions.
Influences community dynamics. Shapes identity of residents. |
| gptkbp:cultural_impact |
Affects perceptions of safety.
Influences lifestyle choices. Reflects changing attitudes towards community. |
| gptkbp:defines |
A term used to describe a private community or neighborhood that is governed by private rules and regulations.
|
| gptkbp:economic_impact |
Can increase property values.
Influences housing market trends. May affect local economies. |
| gptkbp:example |
Condominium complexes.
Gated communities. Planned unit developments. |
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Emerged in the late 20th century.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Privatopia
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Can lead to social segregation.
May affect local governance. |
| gptkbp:is_criticized_for |
Can lead to isolation.
Can undermine public services. May create inequality. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Governed by private contracts.
May involve litigation. Subject to local zoning laws. |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
Boca Raton, Florida.
Celebration, Florida. Irvine, California. Lakewood Ranch, Florida. Mission Viejo, California. Naples, Florida. Reston, Virginia. Scottsdale, Arizona. Summerlin, Nevada. The Woodlands, Texas. |
| gptkbp:population_trend |
Growth of eco-friendly communities.
Increasing popularity in urban areas. Potential for more mixed-use developments. |
| gptkbp:related_to |
Urban planning.
Community living. Private governance. |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Evan_W._Mc_Kenzie
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|