Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:appeals_to |
conviction appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
legal scholars
law enforcement practices criminal procedure legal commentators law school curriculum search warrant requirements Fourth Amendment jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:case_number |
court records
B174123 involved drug offenses California criminal law case |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:defense_strategies
legal textbooks conviction upheld evidence admissible upheld by higher court affirmed by appellate court probable cause existed |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important legal precedent
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
criminal appeal
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
gptkb:Simmons People of the State of California unlawful search lack of probable cause |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2005
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
August 2005
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Simmons
|
| gptkbp:impact |
subsequent cases
|
| gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
2005 WL 2035560
2005 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8230 |
| gptkbp:issues |
search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices of the California Court of Appeal
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
California criminal justice system
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
admissibility of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Fourth Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:lawyer
prosecuting attorney |
| gptkbp:material |
arrest circumstances
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed conviction
upheld legal standards |
| gptkbp:precedent |
California case law
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:significance |
interpretation of search laws
|
| gptkbp:sound |
April 2005
|
| gptkbp:was_a_demonstration_of |
physical evidence
testimonial evidence |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Illinois_Supreme_Court
gptkb:New_York_Supreme_Court |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|