Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:People_v._Aguirre
gptkb:People_v._Cantu gptkb:People_v._King gptkb:People_v._Mc_Donald |
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
misconduct
insufficient evidence filed by defendant |
| gptkbp:case_types |
B239123
|
| gptkbp:command_structure |
prison term
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
ineffective assistance of counsel |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:2013
|
| gptkbp:exhibited_at |
circumstantial evidence
physical evidence testimonial evidence |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Randle
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California criminal procedure
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Randle, 2013
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Frances_Rothschild
gptkb:Justice_H._Walter_Croskey guilty Justice Richard D. Aldrich |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
fair trial
due process right to counsel evidence admission |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
|
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Smith People v. Garcia |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:award
judicial review legal standards criminal justice reform defense rights judicial interpretation conviction upheld defendant's rights constitutional rights burden of proof criminal defense prosecutorial discretion evidence law evidence admissibility case law development standard of review trial procedure appellate procedure |
| gptkbp:party |
People of the State of California
defendant Randle |
| gptkbp:precedent |
California case law
|