Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal appeal
B202123 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2009 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5630
2009 WL 2151834 |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Superior_Court_of_California
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal Edwards evidence was admissible ineffective assistance of counsel unpublished opinion misapplication of law sufficient evidence existed no reversible error based on trial record People_of_the_State_of_California |
| gptkbp:date |
July 7, 2009
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2009
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Edwards
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California_criminal_procedure
|
| gptkbp:involved |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
none
affirmed three judges |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:California
|
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
evidence admission
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process
sufficiency of evidence |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
held interpretation of evidence rules California_criminal_law |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
criminal appeal case
criminal defense strategies clarified evidence standards evidence handling in trials future criminal appeals |
| gptkbp:outcome |
conviction upheld
upheld conviction defendant's conviction affirmed. |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
affirmed lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
limited
California_case_law |
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
appellate jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:People_v._Smith
referenced in later rulings |
| gptkbp:submissionDeadline |
appellant and respondent briefs
|