Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Bling_Ring_gang
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
defendant's appeal
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
No. 12345
appellate case criminal conviction appeal |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:California_Court_of_Appeal
Ames People of the State of California |
| gptkbp:date |
January 15, 1971
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:1971
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
due process
equal protection |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
February 10, 1971
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
People v. Ames
|
| gptkbp:impact |
California criminal procedure
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
6 Cal.3d 1
Cal. App. 3d 1 |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
criminal law
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Tobriner
gptkb:Justice_Mc_Comb gptkb:Justice_Mosk |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
sufficiency of evidence
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:battle
burden of proof reasonable doubt witness credibility evidence admissibility jury instructions |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
jury deliberation
evidence evaluation standard of review |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:People_v._Johnson
gptkb:People_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:outcome |
influence on public policy
conviction upheld affirmed lower court ruling public safety concerns influence on legal education impact on civil rights impact on future legislation defendant's rights upheld judicial review process legal precedent established impact on legal practice legal interpretation of statutes state's interest in prosecution |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal standards
|
| gptkbp:significance |
influenced future cases
|