Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 F.3d 456
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high profile case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion reversed lower court decision |
| gptkbp:date |
April 20, 2021
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2021
|
| gptkbp:description |
dispute over civil rights violations
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Patterson vs. Williams II
|
| gptkbp:impact |
civil rights law
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Williams
Patterson |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Lee
gptkb:Judge_Smith gptkb:Judge_Johnson dissent_by_Judge_Smith |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
civil rights
due process equal protection |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
evaluation of evidence
interpretation of statutes application of precedents examination of state actions review of constitutional rights Patterson's_attorney Williams'_attorney |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark decision
advances social justice influences legal reforms informs legal education reinforces rule of law affects civil rights legislation drives community engagement encourages advocacy efforts enhances judicial accountability fosters legal scholarship highlights systemic issues promotes awareness of rights sets important precedent sparks public debate |
| gptkbp:outcome |
shapes public policy
affects future cases appeal granted guides lower courts influences legal standards |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal standards
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Patterson_v._State
gptkb:Williams_v._State |
| gptkbp:significance |
important for civil rights advocacy
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 15, 2021
|