Properties (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:analyzes |
2 weeks
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
pending appeal
Johansson_appealed_the_decision |
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
Docket No. 21-456
|
| gptkbp:area |
contract law
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2021-12345
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high public interest
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:John_Doe
gptkb:New_York based on contract law principles District_Court Jane_Smith majority_opinion_written_by_Judge_Smith |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
court
|
| gptkbp:defeated |
$100,000
|
| gptkbp:description |
dispute over contract terms
|
| gptkbp:duration |
moderately complex
|
| gptkbp:filingDate |
April 20, 2021
January 10, 2021 |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Patterson vs. Johansson I
|
| gptkbp:impact |
significant impact on contract law
clarified contract interpretation |
| gptkbp:involves |
Patterson
Johansson |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Judge_Smith
none 5 witnesses called several law review articles published |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analyzed by legal scholars
Patterson's_attorney Johansson's_attorney |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive media coverage
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
no settlement reached
set a precedent for similar cases affects future contract disputes Patterson_v._Johansson,_2021_WL_1234567 |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Patterson_awarded_damages
ruling_favoring_Patterson |
| gptkbp:precedent |
influenced future cases
established new legal precedent |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
Johansson_vs._Lee
Patterson_vs._Smith |
| gptkbp:research |
contract documents
emails between parties testimony from expert witness |
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
March 15, 2021
|
| gptkbp:treaty |
failed settlement negotiations
|
| gptkbp:year |
2021
|