Statements (67)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
20-1234
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
appeal
20-1234 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
123 F.3d 456 (2020)
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion dissenting opinion |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2020
June 1, 2020 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2020
|
| gptkbp:description |
dispute over civil rights violations
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
involved expert testimony
involved jury instructions involved statutory interpretation involved appeals process involved arbitration proceedings involved mediation efforts involved multiple parties involved trial proceedings involved constitutional questions involved administrative actions involved amicus briefs involved appeals court review involved damages awarded involved extensive discovery involved government entities involved injunctions sought involved legal fees involved legal standards applied involved motions to dismiss involved private individuals involved public interest groups involved settlement discussions involved summary judgment motions involved verdicts originated from lower court ruling |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Patterson v. Smith
|
| gptkbp:impact |
civil rights law
influenced state laws affected public policy |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Smith
Patterson |
| gptkbp:judges |
Judge A
Judge B Judge C published on case |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
civil rights
due process equal protection under the law first amendment rights fourteenth amendment rights |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
various law journals
Smith's_attorney Patterson's_attorney |
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
significant
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
closed
appeal upheld case remanded for further proceedings |
| gptkbp:precedent |
high
established legal standards |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Jones
Doe_v._Smith |
| gptkbp:significance |
important for civil rights jurisprudence
|