Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
21-1234
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals
affirmed lower court decision |
| gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2021
April 20, 2021 |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2021
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Papke v. McCoy III
|
| gptkbp:impact |
contract law
business law commercial transactions |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Papke
McCoy_III |
| gptkbp:judges |
Judge A
Judge B Judge C |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
breach of contract
damages specific performance contract dispute |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
performance standards
contract formation arbitration agreements statute of limitations contractual obligations choice of law provisions enforceability of contracts jurisdictional issues burden of proof contractual terms evidence evaluation liquidated damages dispute resolution clauses remedies available waiver of rights standard of review equitable relief remedies sought specific performance requirements contractual rights damages calculation contract interpretation contractual remedies third-party beneficiaries interpretation of intent performance conditions unconscionability contractual capacity fraud in the inducement modification of contracts contractual obligations of parties defenses to breach duress in contracts good faith performance misrepresentation in contracts severability of clauses statutory requirements for contracts undue influence in contracts McCoy_III's_attorney Papke's_attorney |
| gptkbp:outcome |
appeal upheld
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
case law
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Smith_v._Jones
Doe v. Roe |